Index: doc/LaTeX/D-Soil Model - Test report/D-Soil Model - Test Report.tex
===================================================================
diff -u -r994 -r998
--- doc/LaTeX/D-Soil Model - Test report/D-Soil Model - Test Report.tex	(.../D-Soil Model - Test Report.tex)	(revision 994)
+++ doc/LaTeX/D-Soil Model - Test report/D-Soil Model - Test Report.tex	(.../D-Soil Model - Test Report.tex)	(revision 998)
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@
 & \quad -- characteristic points (CSV files)	& 7.07	& \OK \\ 
 & \quad -- segments (CSV files)								& 7.08	& \OK \\
 & \quad -- segments (shape files)							& 7.09	& \OK \\ 
-& \quad -- CPT's (GEF-CPT files)							& 7.10	& \OKbut DSB-853/754/758\\
+& \quad -- CPT's (GEF-CPT files)							& 7.10	& \OKbut DSB-853/758\\
 & \quad -- Borings (GEF-Boring files)					& 7.11	& \OKbut DSB-834/782/783\\ \hline
 
 \textbf{REQ 3.3} 	& \textbf{Select relevant SOS info. for project:} & & \\
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@
 
 \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
 
-All the unit and integration tests performed for the validation of \ProgramNamePlusSpace pass and cover 69.6\% of the code, so more than the minimum required code coverage of 60\% prescribed in \cite{OverallTestPlanWTI}. 
+All the unit and integration tests performed for the validation of \ProgramNamePlusSpace pass and cover 69.6\% of the code, so more than the minimum required code coverage of 60\% prescribed in \citep{OverallTestPlanWTI}. 
 
 A complete test of the User Interface has been performed by means of test scripts (see appendix \autoref{app:TestDocument}). Almost all of the test scripts pass; however, a few minor inconveniences were found and reported in the \textit{Known Issues} list.