Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseWBIPipingKernel.tex
===================================================================
diff -u -r2221 -r2396
--- DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseWBIPipingKernel.tex	(.../UseWBIPipingKernel.tex)	(revision 2221)
+++ DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseWBIPipingKernel.tex	(.../UseWBIPipingKernel.tex)	(revision 2396)
@@ -15,40 +15,40 @@
 \section{Uplift (uplift safety)}\label{sec:Uplift}
 For the uplift calculation DAM uses the DAM uplift calculation described in \autoref{sec:UpliftCalculation}
 
-This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.3 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}.
+%This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.3 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}.
+%
+%Input of the kernel consists of:
+%
+%\begin{table}[H]
+	%\centering
+		%\begin{tabular}{|p{20mm}|p{20mm}|p{50mm}|p{50mm}|} \hline
+%\textbf{Symbol}& \textbf{Unit}  & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Value in DAM}  \\ \hline
+%h$_{exit}$		 & m	 & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP)     & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation}    \\ \hline
+%$\Phi _{polder}$ & m & piezometric head in the hinterland (above reference level NAP) & \\HeadPl2 \ \\ \hline
+%$\Phi _{exit}$         & m     & piezometric head at the exit point (above reference level NAP)  & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\  \hline
+%r$_{exit}$               &       & damping factor at the exit point  &  calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation}  \\ \hline
+%m$_{u}$        & -   & model factor uplift &   ?    \\ \hline
+%D$_{cover,i}$	    & m    & thickness of the cover sublayer i at the exit point &  calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters}   \\ \hline
+%$\sigma_{eff}$ &	kN/m$^{2}$ & effective vertical stress at the bottom of the cover layer & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters}  \\ \hline
+%$\gamma_{eff,cover,i}$   & kN/m$^{3}$ & effective volumetric weight of cover sublayer i  & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline
+%$\gamma_{water}$  & kN/m$^{3}$  & volumetric weight of water &  9.81  \\ \hline
+%$\gamma$          & m     & leakage length on the landside of the dike (hinterland)    & New input for DAM \\ \hline
+		%\end{tabular}
+	%\caption{Input paramaters}
+	%\label{tab:InputParametersUplift}
+%\end{table}
+%
+%Output of the kernel for the uplift safety calculation is:
+%\begin{itemize}
+	%\item Z$_u$ (limit state function value)
+	%\item FoS$_{u}$ (factor of safety)
+	%\item $\Delta \Phi _{c,u}$ (critical head difference for uplift)
+	%\item h$_{c,u}$(critical water level for uplift)
+	%\item D$_{cover,i}$ (effective thickness of the cover layer at exit point)
+	%\item $\gamma _{eff}$(effective stress at the exit point)
+	%\item h$_{exit}$(piezometric head at the exit point)
+%\end{itemize}
 
-Input of the kernel consists of:
-
-\begin{table}[H]
-	\centering
-		\begin{tabular}{|p{20mm}|p{20mm}|p{50mm}|p{50mm}|} \hline
-\textbf{Symbol}& \textbf{Unit}  & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Value in DAM}  \\ \hline
-h$_{exit}$		 & m	 & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP)     & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation}    \\ \hline
-$\Phi _{polder}$ & m & piezometric head in the hinterland (above reference level NAP) & \\HeadPl2 \ \\ \hline
-$\Phi _{exit}$         & m     & piezometric head at the exit point (above reference level NAP)  & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\  \hline
-r$_{exit}$               &       & damping factor at the exit point  &  calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation}  \\ \hline
-m$_{u}$        & -   & model factor uplift &   ?    \\ \hline
-D$_{cover,i}$	    & m    & thickness of the cover sublayer i at the exit point &  calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters}   \\ \hline
-$\sigma_{eff}$ &	kN/m$^{2}$ & effective vertical stress at the bottom of the cover layer & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters}  \\ \hline
-$\gamma_{eff,cover,i}$   & kN/m$^{3}$ & effective volumetric weight of cover sublayer i  & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline
-$\gamma_{water}$  & kN/m$^{3}$  & volumetric weight of water &  9.81  \\ \hline
-$\gamma$          & m     & leakage length on the landside of the dike (hinterland)    & New input for DAM \\ \hline
-		\end{tabular}
-	\caption{Input paramaters}
-	\label{tab:InputParametersUplift}
-\end{table}
-
-Output of the kernel for the uplift safety calculation is:
-\begin{itemize}
-	\item Z$_u$ (limit state function value)
-	\item FoS$_{u}$ (factor of safety)
-	\item $\Delta \Phi _{c,u}$ (critical head difference for uplift)
-	\item h$_{c,u}$(critical water level for uplift)
-	\item D$_{cover,i}$ (effective thickness of the cover layer at exit point)
-	\item $\gamma _{eff}$(effective stress at the exit point)
-	\item h$_{exit}$(piezometric head at the exit point)
-\end{itemize}
-
 \section{Heave}\label{sec:Heave}
 This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.4 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}.
 
@@ -91,7 +91,8 @@
 		\begin{tabular}{|p{20mm}|p{20mm}|p{50mm}|p{50mm}|} \hline
 \textbf{Symbol}& \textbf{Unit}  & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Value in DAM}  \\ \hline
 h              & m   & river water level (above reference level NAP) &\textcolor[rgb]{0.65,0.16,0}{BoezemLevelTp} or WaterHeight (when using scenarios) \\ \hline
-h$_{exit}$		 & m	 & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP)     & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PhreaPlane} \\ \hline
+h$_{exit}$		 & m	 & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP)     & calculated
+\\ \hline
 m$_{p}$        & -   & model factor piping &   1.0    \\ \hline
 $\gamma_{water}$  & kN/m$^{3}$  & volumetric weight of water &  9.81  \\ \hline
 r$_{c}$				 & -   & reduction factor providing the fraction of the blanket thickness by which the total head difference is reduced due to hydraulic resistance in the vertical exit channels & 0.3 \\ \hline
