Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/DAM Engine - Functional Design.pdf =================================================================== diff -u -r2288 -r2396 Binary files differ Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseStabKernel.tex =================================================================== diff -u -r2303 -r2396 --- DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseStabKernel.tex (.../UseStabKernel.tex) (revision 2303) +++ DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseStabKernel.tex (.../UseStabKernel.tex) (revision 2396) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\chapter{Use of the D-Geo Stability Kernel} \label{sec:UseStabKernel} +\chapter{Use of the D-Geo Stability Kernel 18.1} \label{sec:UseStabKernel} For stabilily calculation the DAM engine uses the kernel used by D-Geo Stability 18.1 This use is restricted to the options described in this chapter. @@ -13,17 +13,17 @@ All models are available for inwards stability. For outward stability only Bishop is used. -The choice of the model is partly user-defined, partly automatic:\\ -User can choose Bishop, Uplift Van or combination Bishop/Uplift Van.\\ -User can not choose Horizontal balance, this is part of the RRD scenario selection, see \autoref{sec:UpliftCalculation}. +The choice of the model is a demand of the client:\\ +DAM Client can demand Bishop, Uplift Van or combination Bishop/Uplift Van.\\ \subsection{Combination Bishop/Uplift Van} \label{sec:CombinationBishopUpliftVan} -The combination Bishop/Uplift Van give three results: +The combination Bishop/Uplift Van gives three results: \begin{enumerate} \item Bishop - \item Uplift Van (is made when \textit{\textcolor[rgb]{0.65,0.16,0}{UpliftCriterionStability}}) is higher than the uplift safety (see \autoref {sec:CheckUplift}). + \item Uplift Van\newline + The client provides a requested uplift safety. The UpliftVan calculation is made when this requested uplift safety factor is lower than the calculated uplift safety factor (for definition see \autoref {sec:UpliftCalculation}). Otherwise the result is 'not calculated'. \item Normative result (lowest safety factor) of both. \end{enumerate} @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ Ad 1 Automatic generation\newline See FD of Macrostability kernel. -Ad 2 User defined generation\newline -The user defines the dimensions; number of gridpoints and distance between the points. The DAM engine defines the position of the grid depending on the characteristic points: -For Bishop and for the left grid of LiftVan the left bottom corner is situated at the surfaceline in the middle of the crest (distance between outer- and innercrest). The right bottom corner of the right grid of LiftVan is situated above the most right x co-ordinate where uplift occurs. With the restriction that the left bottom corner can not be situated left of the x co-ordinate of the DikeToePolder. +Ad 2 Client defined generation\newline +The client defines the dimensions; number of gridpoints and distance between the points. The \ProgramName defines the position of the grid depending on the characteristic points: +For Bishop and for the left grid of LiftVan the left (outside) bottom corner is situated at the surfaceline in the middle of the crest (distance between outer- and innercrest). The right bottom corner of the right (inside) grid of LiftVan is situated above the most right x co-ordinate where uplift occurs. With the restriction that the left bottom corner can not be situated left of the x co-ordinate of the DikeToePolder. \subsection{Tangent lines generation} \label{sec:TangentLinesGeneration} @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ There are two options: \begin{enumerate} \item automatic generation - \item user defined generation + \item client defined generation \end{enumerate} Ad 1 Automatic generation\newline @@ -62,12 +62,11 @@ Liftvan\newline -to described-\newline -Ad 2 User defined\newline -For Bishop calcuations the tangent lines are generated automatic. +Ad 2 Client defined\newline +For Bishop calcuations the tangent lines can not be defined by the client.\newline +For LiftVan the client must provide the distance between the tangent lines. +The lower tangentline is always situated 5.0 m below the upper geometry point of the lowest aquifer. The tangentlines are drawn with the given distance until the upper tangent line is situated above the Z DikeToeAtPolder. -For LiftVan the user (client of DAM-Engine) must provide the distance between the tangent lines, \textcolor[rgb]{1,0,0}{\textsl{Distance tangent lines (UV) }}. -The lower tangentline is always situated 5.0 m below the upper geometry point of the lowest aquifer. The tangentlines are drawn with the given distance until the upper tangent line is situated above the Z;DikeToeAtPolder. - \subsection{Calculation area} \label{sec:CalculationArea} For the model Horizontal balance a calculation area must be defined: @@ -100,7 +99,7 @@ \section{Zone Plot} \label{sec:Zoneplot} -The option of zone plot in D-Geo Stability is defined as the distinction of the slip circles in different zones; 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a and 3b.\newline +The option of zone plot in D-Geo Stability is defined as the distinction of the slip circles in different zones; 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a and 3b, see manual D-Geo Stability.\newline DAM only uses zone 1 and zone 2. Zone Plot is used when\textsl{\textcolor[rgb]{0.65,0.16,0}{ZoneType}} = ZoneAreas @@ -117,21 +116,24 @@ Calculation with zone areas is only possible for inward stability calculations. \section{Calculation options}\label{sec:CalculationOptions} -D-Geostability offers different following calculation options. DAM uses the following settings: +D-Geostability offers different following calculation options. \ProgramName uses for the following settings the defaults of D-Geo Stability 18.1: \begin{itemize} \item Requested number of slices: default D-Geo Stability - \item Minimum circle depth: user defined: \textsl{\textcolor[rgb]{0.65,0.16,0}{MinimalCircleDepth}} - \item Minimum slip plan length: default D-Geo Stability + \item Minimum slip plan length: default D-Geo Stability \item Start value safety factor: default D-Geo Stability \item Minimum x-entrance used: default D-Geo Stability - \item Maximum x-entrance used: user defined \end{itemize} -The maximum x-entrance used is not directly user defined, but via Forbidden zones. +The following settings can be defined by the client: +\begin{itemize} + \item Minimum circle depth + \item Maximum x-entrance +\end{itemize} -\subsubsection{Forbidden zone } -\label{sec:Forbidden zone} +The maximum x-entrance used is not directly client defined. The client provides a Forbidden zone and the \ProgramName calculates a maximum x-entrance via a method described in \autoref{sec:ForbiddenZone}. + +\subsubsection{Forbidden zone }\label{sec:ForbiddenZone} Forbidden zone is an option to define a forbidden zone for the entrance point of the slip plane. The forbidden zone is situated to the rigth side of a certain x co-ordinate. This x co-ordinate is defined by the \textsl{ForbiddenZoneFactor}. Xlocal;forbidden zone WF =(Xlocal;DikeTopAtPolder) + ForbiddenZoneFactor*(Xlocal;DikeToeAtPolder - Xlocal;DikeTopAtPolder) A forbidden zone is used when \textsl{ZoneType} = ForbiddenZone. Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/DAM Engine - Functional Design.tex =================================================================== diff -u -r2220 -r2396 --- DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/DAM Engine - Functional Design.tex (.../DAM Engine - Functional Design.tex) (revision 2220) +++ DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/DAM Engine - Functional Design.tex (.../DAM Engine - Functional Design.tex) (revision 2396) @@ -27,16 +27,16 @@ \references{Refer to \autoref{chapterLiterature}.} -\summary{This document contains the functional design for \ProgramName, a software module that computes the strength of a complete dikering with respect to several failure mechanisms, such as macro stability and piping.\\ +\summary{This document contains the functional design for \ProgramName, a software module that computes the strength of a complete dike stretch with respect to several failure mechanisms, such as macro stability and piping.\\ \\ \textbf{\footnotesize{Samenvatting}} \\ -Dit document bevat het functioneel ontwerp voor \ProgramName, een software module die een gebruiker in staat stelt om voor een dijktraject berekeningen uit te voeren voor verschillende faalmechanismen, waaronder macrostabiliteit en piping.} +Dit document bevat het functioneel ontwerp voor \ProgramName, een software module die, gekoppeld aan een GUI, de gebruiker in staat stelt om voor een dijktraject berekeningen uit te voeren voor verschillende faalmechanismen, waaronder macrostabiliteit en piping.} -\versioni{0.1} -\datei{Jun 2018} +\versioni{0.2} +\datei{Sep 2019} \authori{Irene van der Zwan} \revieweri{Kin Sun Lam \newline Andr\'e Grijze} -\approvali{Maya Sule} +\approvali{Leo Voogt} \status{draft} \disclaimer{This is a draft report, intended for discussion purposes only. No part of this report may be relied upon by either principals or third parties.} @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ \include{UseStabKernel} \include{UpliftCalculations} \include{FODAMPipingKernel} +\include{Use of WBI piping kernel} \include{DesignGeometryAdaption} \include{REQDataGenerationWater} %----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UpliftCalculations.tex =================================================================== diff -u -r1279 -r2396 --- DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UpliftCalculations.tex (.../UpliftCalculations.tex) (revision 1279) +++ DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UpliftCalculations.tex (.../UpliftCalculations.tex) (revision 2396) @@ -1,16 +1,15 @@ \chapter{Uplift calculation}\label{sec:UpliftCalculation} \label{sec:UpliftCalculation} -\ProgramName makes calculations to see whether there is any uplift from the inner toe to the centre of the ditch bed. The formula from the VTV (2006) is used for this purpose. +\ProgramName makes calculations to see whether there is any uplift from the inner toe to the centre of the ditch bottom or to the right limit of the geometry if there is no ditch.\newline +The formula from the VTV (2006) is used for this purpose. \begin{equation} \label{eq_opdrukveiligheid} Uplift safety = \frac{\sigma_g}{\sigma_w} \end{equation} -If there is no ditch present, the calculations will extend to the edge of the cross-section. +The check for uplift is done at every surface line point from the characteristic point DikeToeAtPolder to the centre of the ditch bottom or to the characteristic point SurfaceLevelInside (from left to right). -The check for uplift is done at every surface line point from DikeToeAtPolder to SurfaceLevelInside (from left to right). - The check for uplift has the following purposes: \begin{itemize} \item To decide if a LiftVan calculation is required, see \autoref{sec:CombinationBishopUpliftVan}. Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/FODAMPipingKernel.tex =================================================================== diff -u -r2222 -r2396 --- DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/FODAMPipingKernel.tex (.../FODAMPipingKernel.tex) (revision 2222) +++ DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/FODAMPipingKernel.tex (.../FODAMPipingKernel.tex) (revision 2396) @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ %to be translated -\chapter{Piping} -\label{sec:FODAMPipingKernel} +\chapter{Use of DAM Piping kernel} \label{sec:FODAMPipingKernel} @@ -72,23 +71,6 @@ \label{fig:piping6} \end{figure} -\section{Sellmeijer revised (WBI)}\label{sec:SellmeijerRevised} -Sellmeijer revised (WBI) consists of three sub failure mechanisms: uplift, heave and backward erosion. -For the determination of the exit point DAM determines the first uplift location, from the innertoe inwards, with the DAM-uplift calculation, described in \autoref{sec:UpliftCalculation}. -At this exit point DAM determines the three submechanisms via de WBI-piping kernel. - -\subsection{Uplift (uplift safety)}\label{sec:Uplift} -This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.3 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}. - -\subsection{Heave}\label{sec:Heave} -This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.4 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}. - -\subsection{Internal erosion (backward erosion)}\label{sec:InternalErosion} -This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.5 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}. - -The submechanism with the highest safetyfactor is presented as the normative submechanism. - - Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseWBIPipingKernel.tex =================================================================== diff -u -r2221 -r2396 --- DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseWBIPipingKernel.tex (.../UseWBIPipingKernel.tex) (revision 2221) +++ DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/UseWBIPipingKernel.tex (.../UseWBIPipingKernel.tex) (revision 2396) @@ -15,40 +15,40 @@ \section{Uplift (uplift safety)}\label{sec:Uplift} For the uplift calculation DAM uses the DAM uplift calculation described in \autoref{sec:UpliftCalculation} -This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.3 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}. +%This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.3 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}. +% +%Input of the kernel consists of: +% +%\begin{table}[H] + %\centering + %\begin{tabular}{|p{20mm}|p{20mm}|p{50mm}|p{50mm}|} \hline +%\textbf{Symbol}& \textbf{Unit} & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Value in DAM} \\ \hline +%h$_{exit}$ & m & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP) & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\ \hline +%$\Phi _{polder}$ & m & piezometric head in the hinterland (above reference level NAP) & \\HeadPl2 \ \\ \hline +%$\Phi _{exit}$ & m & piezometric head at the exit point (above reference level NAP) & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\ \hline +%r$_{exit}$ & & damping factor at the exit point & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\ \hline +%m$_{u}$ & - & model factor uplift & ? \\ \hline +%D$_{cover,i}$ & m & thickness of the cover sublayer i at the exit point & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline +%$\sigma_{eff}$ & kN/m$^{2}$ & effective vertical stress at the bottom of the cover layer & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline +%$\gamma_{eff,cover,i}$ & kN/m$^{3}$ & effective volumetric weight of cover sublayer i & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline +%$\gamma_{water}$ & kN/m$^{3}$ & volumetric weight of water & 9.81 \\ \hline +%$\gamma$ & m & leakage length on the landside of the dike (hinterland) & New input for DAM \\ \hline + %\end{tabular} + %\caption{Input paramaters} + %\label{tab:InputParametersUplift} +%\end{table} +% +%Output of the kernel for the uplift safety calculation is: +%\begin{itemize} + %\item Z$_u$ (limit state function value) + %\item FoS$_{u}$ (factor of safety) + %\item $\Delta \Phi _{c,u}$ (critical head difference for uplift) + %\item h$_{c,u}$(critical water level for uplift) + %\item D$_{cover,i}$ (effective thickness of the cover layer at exit point) + %\item $\gamma _{eff}$(effective stress at the exit point) + %\item h$_{exit}$(piezometric head at the exit point) +%\end{itemize} -Input of the kernel consists of: - -\begin{table}[H] - \centering - \begin{tabular}{|p{20mm}|p{20mm}|p{50mm}|p{50mm}|} \hline -\textbf{Symbol}& \textbf{Unit} & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Value in DAM} \\ \hline -h$_{exit}$ & m & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP) & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\ \hline -$\Phi _{polder}$ & m & piezometric head in the hinterland (above reference level NAP) & \\HeadPl2 \ \\ \hline -$\Phi _{exit}$ & m & piezometric head at the exit point (above reference level NAP) & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\ \hline -r$_{exit}$ & & damping factor at the exit point & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PiezHeadUpliftLocation} \\ \hline -m$_{u}$ & - & model factor uplift & ? \\ \hline -D$_{cover,i}$ & m & thickness of the cover sublayer i at the exit point & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline -$\sigma_{eff}$ & kN/m$^{2}$ & effective vertical stress at the bottom of the cover layer & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline -$\gamma_{eff,cover,i}$ & kN/m$^{3}$ & effective volumetric weight of cover sublayer i & calculated, see \autoref{sec:DeterminationSoilParameters} \\ \hline -$\gamma_{water}$ & kN/m$^{3}$ & volumetric weight of water & 9.81 \\ \hline -$\gamma$ & m & leakage length on the landside of the dike (hinterland) & New input for DAM \\ \hline - \end{tabular} - \caption{Input paramaters} - \label{tab:InputParametersUplift} -\end{table} - -Output of the kernel for the uplift safety calculation is: -\begin{itemize} - \item Z$_u$ (limit state function value) - \item FoS$_{u}$ (factor of safety) - \item $\Delta \Phi _{c,u}$ (critical head difference for uplift) - \item h$_{c,u}$(critical water level for uplift) - \item D$_{cover,i}$ (effective thickness of the cover layer at exit point) - \item $\gamma _{eff}$(effective stress at the exit point) - \item h$_{exit}$(piezometric head at the exit point) -\end{itemize} - \section{Heave}\label{sec:Heave} This function of the kernel is decribed in paragraph 3.4 in \citep{PipingKernel_FunctionalDesign}. @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ \begin{tabular}{|p{20mm}|p{20mm}|p{50mm}|p{50mm}|} \hline \textbf{Symbol}& \textbf{Unit} & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Value in DAM} \\ \hline h & m & river water level (above reference level NAP) &\textcolor[rgb]{0.65,0.16,0}{BoezemLevelTp} or WaterHeight (when using scenarios) \\ \hline -h$_{exit}$ & m & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP) & calculated, see \autoref{sec:PhreaPlane} \\ \hline +h$_{exit}$ & m & phreatic level at the exit point (above reference level NAP) & calculated +\\ \hline m$_{p}$ & - & model factor piping & 1.0 \\ \hline $\gamma_{water}$ & kN/m$^{3}$ & volumetric weight of water & 9.81 \\ \hline r$_{c}$ & - & reduction factor providing the fraction of the blanket thickness by which the total head difference is reduced due to hydraulic resistance in the vertical exit channels & 0.3 \\ \hline Index: DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/FO.tex =================================================================== diff -u -r2288 -r2396 --- DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/FO.tex (.../FO.tex) (revision 2288) +++ DamEngine/trunk/doc/Dam Engine - Functional Design/FO.tex (.../FO.tex) (revision 2396) @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ This document contains the functional design for the \ProgramName, a computational engine for the automated calculation of the strength of dikes. DAM was developed by Deltares with and for STOWA for all water authorities. -This document describes requirements and functional design of \ProgramName. -What will actually will be implemented depends on the requirements of the clients using this \ProgramName. +This document describes requirements and functional design of \ProgramName. So it is clear what the purpose of \ProgramName is and which functionaliry +What will actually will be implemented depends on the prioritizing of the requirements by the clients using this \ProgramName. If some functionality is not (yet) needed, then that part does not need to be implemented. \subsection{Future options} @@ -39,64 +39,73 @@ \ProgramName - Test Plan \newline \citep{DAMEngine_TestPlan} & Description of the different regression and acceptation tests, including target values. (not available yet). \\ \hline \ProgramName - Test Report \newline \citep{DAMEngine_TestReport} & Description of the test results (benchmarks and test scripts)(not available yet). \\ \hline Architecture Guidelines \newline \citep{ArchitectureGuidelines} & Architecture guidelines that are used by DSC-Deltares. \\ \hline -Overview of data used \newline \citep{DAMDataUIEngine} & Table with data used by DAM UI and\ProgramName\\ \hline +Overview of data used \newline \citep{DAMDataUIEngine} & Table with data used by DAM UI and \ProgramName\\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{\small \ProgramName system documents.} \label{table-SystemDocuments} \end{table} -\section{Document revisions} - -\section{Document revisions} -\label{sec:DocumentRevisions} +\section{Document revisions}\label{sec:DocumentRevisions} \subsection{Revision 0.1} \label{sec:Revision01} First concept of the document. +\subsection{Revision 0.2} \label{sec:Revision02} +Textual adaptations.\newline +Assessment is removed from the requirements. +{sec:TLDegOfCo} added. -\chapter{Non-functional requirements} \chapter{Functional requirements} -Main purpose of the \ProgramName is to get data from DAM Clients, uses this data as calculation input and make serially calculations with one ore more kernels and generates output. This can be broken down to the next use cases:\newline +Main purpose of the \ProgramName is to get data from DAM Clients, use this data as calculation input and make serially calculations demanded by the DAM Client with one or more kernels and generates output. This can be broken down to the next user stories:\newline -Use case Design - UC Design\newline +User story Design\newline As a user I want to adapt the geometry until given safety for stability or piping is met. -Use case Operational sensors - UC Operational.sensors\newline +User stort Operational sensors\newline As a user I want to make stability and/or piping calculations with the input from operational sensors. -Since most requirements are needed for multiple use cases, the requirements are classified per theme, not per Use Case. The themes are: data, calculation and output. +Since most requirements are needed for both user stories, the requirements are classified per theme, not per User story. The themes are: data, calculation and output. The requirements per Use case are given in next table. \section{Data} \subsection{REQ Data.Format}\label{sec:REQDataFormat} -The \ProgramName has a defined format for the data input, so DAM Clients know how to arrange the input data. +\subsubsection{Location}\label{sec:REQDataFormatLocation} +Locations are defined by a unique name and RD coordinates. + +\subsubsection{Geometry}\label{sec:REQDataFormatGeometry} +The geometry is defined by a surfaceline and characteristicpoints on this surfaceline. The surfaceline is limited by a surfaceleveloutside at the left side and surfaceline inside at the right sight. +The left side of the geomtry is the riverside and the side of the variable waterlevel outside. The right side is the polderside (inside). + +\subsubsection{Subsoil}\label{sec:REQDataFormatSubsoil} +The subsoil is defined by line shaped segments. Each segment is defined by one or more soilprofiles with a probability (sums up to 100\%). And a soilprofile describes the boundaries of the layers and their material. + +\subsubsection{Water pressures}\label{sec:REQDataFormatWaterpressure} +\ProgramName can schematize water pressures for piping and stability kernels, see \autoref{sec:GenerationPorePressures}. +Data needed for this schematization consists of waterlevels and the schematization parameter water pressure per layer. + \subsection{REQ Data.Content}\label{sec:REQDataContent} The \ProgramName has a defined content for the data input, so DAM Clients know how to arrange the input data. The required data is described in xsd-files in https://repos.deltares.nl/ repos/ dam/ DamEngine/ trunk/ xsd. -An overview of the required data for the engine in relation to DAM UI data is described in https://repos.deltares.nl/ repos/ dam/ DamOverall/ trunk/ doc/ DAM General/ OverviewDataUIAndEngine.xlsx. In this Functional design is referred to parameters mentioned in this overview by giving the \textcolor[rgb]{0.65,0.16,0}{\textsl{name}}. +An overview of the required data for the engine in relation to DAM UI data is described in https://repos.deltares.nl/ repos/ dam/ DamOverall/ trunk/ doc/ DAM General/ OverviewDataUIAndEngine.xlsx. In this Functional design is refered to parameters mentioned in this overview by giving the \textcolor[rgb]{0.65,0.16,0}{\textsl{name}}. \section{Calculation}\label{sec:Calculation} \subsection{Kernels}\label{sec:Kernels} -The \ProgramName provides calculations with the following stability and piping kernels: +The \ProgramName provides calculations with the following stability and piping kernels: \begin{enumerate} \item Stability; kernel used by D-Geo Stability 18.1 - \item \textsl{Stability; kernel used by D-Geo Stability 2019} + \item \textsl{Stability; kernel used by D-Stability 2019} \item Piping; DAM-kernel piping - \item \textit{Piping; WBI-kernel piping} + \item Piping; WBI-kernel piping \end{enumerate} Italic printed functionalities are not implemented in DAM yet. -\subsubsection{REQ Calc.Kernel15}\label{sec:REQ CalcKernel15} -The DAM engine can make stability calculations with the kernel of D-Geostability 15.1. -The options used by the DAM engine are described in \autoref{sec:UseStabKernel}. - \subsubsection{REQ Calc.Kernel18}\label{sec:REQ CalcKernel18} The DAM engine can make stability calculations with the kernel of D-Geostability 18.1. The options used by the DAM engine are equal to the use of the kernel of D-Geostability 15.1 and are described in \autoref{sec:UseStabKernel}. @@ -132,9 +141,8 @@ \label{sec:Output} \subsection{REQ Output.format}\label{sec:REQOutputFormat} -The \ProgramName has a defined format for the data output, so DAM Clients know how to present the output data. +\textit{} - %The \ProgramName provides three types of major calculations: %\begin{enumerate}[A.] %\item One-fold calculation: the input goes 'through' the kernel(s) and generates one main calculation answer (assessment and scenario);